Azure vs Google Cloud (GCP): Head-to-Head Pricing & TCO Analysis (2026)
Detailed cost comparison of Microsoft Azure and Google Cloud Platform across Virtual Machines (Azure VMs vs Compute Engine), Object Storage (Azure Blob vs Cloud Storage), Managed Databases (Azure SQL vs Cloud SQL), Kubernetes (AKS vs GKE), and internet data egress.
Some links on this page are affiliate links — we may earn a commission if you sign up. This never affects the prices shown or the ranking, which is computed from published list prices. Full disclosure
Microsoft Azure
Azure BenchmarkGoogle Cloud Platform
GCP BenchmarkAzure vs GCP Feature & Capability Matrix
Pricing rows are computed live from the current catalogs, not hand-typed — they'll never silently go stale.
| Feature / Capability | Microsoft Azure | Google Cloud Platform | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Internet egress (10 TB/mo) Networking | $0.0870/GB effective | $0.1200/GB effective | Azure |
Free egress allowance Networking | None | None | Tie |
Hot object storage ($/GB-mo) Storage | $0.0208/GB-mo | $0.0200/GB-mo | GCP |
Archive storage ($/GB-mo) Storage | $0.0010/GB-mo | $0.0012/GB-mo | Azure |
Object storage tiers offered Storage | 4 tiers | 4 tiers | Tie |
Managed Kubernetes control plane (1st cluster) Kubernetes | Free (1st cluster) | Free (1st cluster) | Tie |
Cheapest 4 vCPU / 16 GB Linux instance Compute | $125.56/mo (Standard_D4as_v5) | $97.82/mo (e2-standard-4) | GCP |
Deepest 3-year reserved discount Compute | 60% off on-demand | 45% off on-demand | Azure |
Spot / preemptible instances Compute | ~80% off on-demand | ~65% off on-demand | Azure |
Managed SQL Server Database | Offered | Offered | Tie |
Windows Server on compute Compute | Offered | Offered | Tie |
Load balancer Networking | $18.25/mo | $18.25/mo | Tie |
Static IPv4 address Networking | $2.92/mo | $2.92/mo | Tie |
Windows Licensing Advantages Licensing | Azure Hybrid Benefit cuts up to 55% with existing EA | Standard Windows Server hourly license surcharge | Azure |
Automatic Volume Discounts Compute | Reserved Instances required | Automatic Sustained Use Discounts (up to 30%) | GCP |
Custom VM Configurations Compute | Pre-packaged VM sizes only | Custom Machine Types (exact vCPU & RAM) | GCP |
Cost Comparison Matrix
Side-by-Side Cost Matrix Monthly & Annual TCO
Comparing line-item equivalents across AWS us-east-1 (N. Virginia), Azure East US, GCP us-east1 (South Carolina).
Amazon Web Services
us-east-1 (N. Virginia)💡 Graviton3/4 arm64 processors offer up to 20% lower price/performance.
| Provider | Compute | Storage | Database | Network | Monthly TCO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AWS us-east-1 (N. Virginia) | $49/mo t4g.medium | $12/mo Amazon S3 (HOT) | $61/mo RDS/Aurora db.t4g.medium | $155/mo AWS Data Transfer & ELB | $277 $3,322/yr |
Azure East US | $126/mo Standard_D2as_v5 | $11/mo Azure Blob Storage (HOT) | $112/mo Azure Database Flexible Server D2ds_v5 | $152/mo Azure Data Transfer & Load Balancer | $399 $4,794/yr |
GCP us-east1 (South Carolina) | $98/mo e2-standard-2 | $10/mo Google Cloud Storage (HOT) | $93/mo Cloud SQL db-custom-2-7680 | $201/mo Google Cloud Data Transfer & Load Balancer | $402 $4,823/yr |
Cost Comparison Visualizer
Visual TCO breakdown across 3 selected providers.
Cloud Optimization Insights
Actionable techniques to decrease your infrastructure bill, per selected provider.
Migrate general-purpose workloads to AWS Graviton3/4 processors for up to 20% better price/performance compared to standard x86 instances.
If your organization owns on-premises Windows Server or SQL Server licenses with Software Assurance, apply them to Azure VMs for up to 40% savings.
Avoid paying for predefined instance shapes. Google Cloud allows custom vCPU & memory ratios tailored specifically to your exact application footprint.
Infrastructure Spec Configurator
Customize workload specs to update the matrix dynamically.
Workload Growth & Traffic Scale Simulator
Project non-linear cost curves at 2x, 5x, or 10x production capacity.
FinOps Commitment & Cash-Flow Advisor
Azure vs GCP — Frequently Asked Questions
Is Azure or GCP cheaper for virtual machines?
For standard on-demand Linux instances, Azure and GCP are closely priced. GCP's automatic Sustained Use Discounts give it an edge for always-on workloads (5-15% cheaper without any commitment). Azure's advantage is Azure Hybrid Benefit for Windows and SQL Server workloads, which can cut costs by 40-55%. GCP's custom machine types also help avoid paying for unused CPU or RAM.
Which has better Kubernetes pricing: AKS or GKE?
AKS (Azure Kubernetes Service) provides free cluster management on the standard tier — the control plane costs $0. GKE charges $0.10/hour ($73/month) per cluster but waives this for the first zonal cluster. For multi-cluster enterprise deployments, AKS is typically cheaper on management fees, while GKE excels in Kubernetes-native tooling and Autopilot mode.
How do Azure and GCP storage costs compare?
Azure Blob Hot tier costs ~$0.018/GB-month vs Google Cloud Storage Standard at ~$0.020/GB-month in comparable regions. For archive storage, both converge near $0.001/GB-month. Azure offers ZRS (Zone-Redundant Storage) at modest premium, while GCP provides dual-region and multi-region options. Operation costs (reads/writes) are similar across both platforms.
Which provider is better for enterprise organizations?
Azure has a strong enterprise advantage through deep Microsoft 365, Active Directory, and Windows Server integration. Organizations with existing Microsoft Enterprise Agreements often receive significant Azure credits. GCP appeals to data-engineering-heavy enterprises with BigQuery, Dataflow, and superior Kubernetes tooling. The choice typically depends on existing technology ecosystem investment.